Arabic - Español
Please note that this is a work in progress. If you have information about legislative or constitutional provisions protecting children from age discrimination in your country, please email email@example.com.
Discrimination against children occurs in every corner of the globe. Because it is so ingrained in so many aspects of life - school, work, and home alike - we must call on our governments to take proactive measures to eliminate age discrimination. From issuing declarations to passing legislation or even amending national constitutions, many countries and organisations have taken action to ensure that children enjoy the same rights and protections as adults. Most notably, Australia enacted a comprehensive Age Discrimination Act in 2004. While the Act does permit differential treatment of children in some circumstances, it has done much to address age-based discrimination against children. A review of this and other countries' actions to guarantee children equal status to adults follows:
Contents: Australia - Belarus - the European Union - Finland - Germany - Netherlands - New Zealand - South Africa - Sweden - United Kingdom (Northern Ireland) - Other initiatives
Australia (Age Discrimination Act 2004)
The Age Discrimination Act 2004 generally prohibits direct6 and indirect7 discrimination on the basis of age in employment, education, access to public spaces, provision of goods and services, and accommodation, among other areas. The primary aspects of the Act are detailed below; additional background information is available on the website of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission for Australia (http://www.hreoc.gov.au/age/publications.html; http://www.hreoc.gov.au/legal/FDL/chap2.html)
Prohibition of Age Discrimination
- Employment: The prohibition on age discrimination applies broadly to the large majority of employers (companies, partnerships, etc.) and employment relationships (permanent, agency, contract). It covers the entire employment process from offer and terms to termination, including working conditions, guidelines for promotion and transfer, training,and benefits. Notably, there is a controversial exception for "youth wages," as discussed below, which allow for lower salaries to be paid to employees under the age of 21.
- Education: The Act prohibits discrimination in the admission process, expulsion or other disciplinary proceedings, and the provision of institutional benefits.
- Access: If a space or building is open to the public or any part of the public, no one may be denied access to that space or building on the basis of their age.
- Goods/Services/Facilities: It is unlawful to discriminate on the basis of age in providing goods or services, or making facilities available.
- Accommodation: Residential and commercial landlords may not discriminate against tenants on the basis of age.
- Land: Age discrimination is prohibited in the sale or transfer of land.Government Programmes: Officials may not discriminate on the basis of age in administering government programmes.
Although the prohibition on age discrimination applies in most instances, the Act does provide for several exceptions where people may continue to be treated differently because of their age. Importantly, "positive discrimination" - where an act or programme is directed to benefit someone at a disadvantage because of their age - is permitted. Charities and voluntary organisations may also consider age in providing services, and religious bodies may act in line with established traditions that discriminate on the basis of age. There are additional exceptions for insurance, health care, pensions and other retirement benefits, government employment programs, and immigration and citizenship matters. Of most relevance to children, however, is the exception that allows for lower "youth wages" to be paid to employees under 21.
Section 25 of the Act allows for employers to pay people under 21 at lower rates for the same work conducted by their adult counterparts. Officially, the Australian government views youth wages as creating an incentive for companies to hire younger people, providing them with opportunities they wouldn't otherwise have. However, according to a background report on age discrimination prepared in anticipation of the Age Discrimination Act, there is not a lot of evidence that raising young persons' wages to equal those of adults would increase youth unemployment. The Commissioner or Children for the state of New South Wales has publicly questioned the utility of youth wages, and it is hoped that Australia will follow the lead of neighbouring New Zealand in abolishing youth wages and offering children and young adults equal pay for equal work.
The Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (HREOC) is responsible for promoting understanding and acceptance of the Act and for monitoring compliance with its provisions. Specifically, the Act calls on the HREOC to publish guidelines for avoiding age discrimination, establish educational and research programmes, review future legislation for consistency with the Act, and recommend laws or other measures to end age discrimination. Where appropriate, the HREOC may also intervene in court proceedings on age discrimination.
Victims of age discrimination may file written complaints with the Australian Human Rights Commission. The Commission offers assistance to anyone interested in filing a complaint, and the complaint process itself is designed to be straightforward and accessible. Once a complaint has been lodged, the Commission will investigate the complaint and work with all parties involved through mediation to find a solution that works for everyone. If mediation does not work, complaints may then be taken to federal court.
Article 44 of the Belarussian Constitution prohibits age discrimination in wage rates, providing that "women, men, adults and minors shall be entitled to equal remuneration for work of equal value."
The European Parliament has recently approved a draft Council Directive on implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of belief, disability, age, or sexual orientation in areas other than employment. This needs to go to the Council of ministers for unanimous approval before it can be passed. However, the United Kingdom is seeking to oppose the inclusion of children from protection against age discrimination at the Council of Ministers. Additionally, as it now reads, Recital 14 allows for "differences in treatment on grounds of age and disability...if they are objectively and reasonably justified by a legitimate aim and the means of achieving that aim are appropriate and necessary."
Essentially, this exception allows governments to pass laws that suitably aim to regulate the labour market and are no more discriminatory than necessary. These laws must balance the discriminatory effect of their provisions against the importance of the government's aim (which might include things like facilitating access to employment or expanding vocational training programmes), and the government must consider whether other less discriminatory means might have achieved this same aim. Where challenges to these laws are made, national courts can assess the legislation's goals and determine whether these warrant the specified level of discriminatory treatment.
Read Young Equals briefing on the age discrimination and the EU Directive.
Finland has a constitutional provision on age equality that specifically includes children. Section 6 of the Constitution provides that "[n]o one shall, without an acceptable reason, be treated differently from other persons on the ground of" age and that "[c]hildren shall be treated equally and as individuals and they shall be allowed to influence matters pertaining to themselves to a degree corresponding to their level of development."
At a local level, federal states in Germany (Länder) have passed legislation relating to building
standards to ensure buildings are accessible to disabled people, older people and people with small
Until now, the ensuring of access to buildings was primarily secured through the building codes of the states. These contain provisions on the types of buildings that must allow barrier-free access. An example of these provisions is section 39 of the Building Code of Baden-Württemberg.284 It requires a barrier-free environment for facilities used by small children, people with disabilities, and the elderly.
Landesbauordnung für Baden-Württemberg, Aug. 8, 1995, Gesetzblatt Fur Das Land Baden – Wurttemberg at 617, as amended.
The Netherlands extends protection from age discrimination in employment to children. The Act of 17 December 2003 guarantees equal treatment irrespective of age in employment, occupation and vocational training (Equal Treatment in Employment (Age Discrimination) Act). To file complaints about age discrimination in employment, contact the Dutch Equal Treatment Commission weekdays between 2 and 4 p.m. Central Euopean time at +31 30 888 38 88.
The New Zealand Human Rights Act prohibits discrimination on the grounds of age for people aged 16 and over1 in employment; access and use of public spaces; the provision of goods, services, and facilities; and accommodation. There are certain exceptions to this protection relating to – among other things - insurance, certain education policies, and membership requirements for clubs or organisations.
Although the Human Rights Act initially allowed for lower youth wage rates, the government recently moved to stop discrimination against children in employment by abolishing youth wages with the passage of the Minimum Wage (New Entrants) Amendment Act 2008. Notably, this legislation does permit lower pay rates for “new entrants,” those in their first 200 hours or three months of work. The complete act as now in force can be read here, and the background behind the introduction of the bill to abolish youth wages is described here.
Following a previous increase in youth wages in 2001, a study, "Youth Minimum Wage Reform and the Labour Market" was commissioned to determine the effects of the increase on youth employment. The results revealed “no adverse effects on youth employment or hours worked” on young adults and “stronger evidence of positive employment responses to the changes” for teenagers receiving higher wage rates.
“Abstract: This paper analyses the effects of a large reform in the minimum wages affecting youth workers in New Zealand since 2001. Prior to this reform, a youth minimum wage, applying to 16-19 year-olds, was set at 60 per cent of the adult minimum. The reform had two components. First, it lowered the eligible age for the adult minimum wage from 20 to 18 years, and resulted in a 69 per cent increase in the minimum wage for 18 and 19 year-olds. Second, the reform raised the youth minimum wage in two annual steps from 60 per cent to 80 per cent of the adult minimum, and resulted in a 41 per cent increase in the minimum wage for 16 and 17 year-olds over a two-year period. We use data from the New Zealand Household Labour Force Survey (HLFS) to estimate the impact of these changes on a variety of labour market and related outcomes. We compare the average outcomes of these two groups of teenagers, before and after the policy reform, to those of 20-25 year-olds, who were unaffected by the reform. We find no robust evidence of adverse effects on youth employment or hours worked. In fact, we find stronger evidence of positive employment responses to the changes for both groups of teenagers, and that 16-17 year-olds increased their hours worked by 10-15 per cent following the minimum wage changes. Given the absence of any adverse employment effects, we find significant increases in labour earnings and total income of teenagers relative to young adults. However, we do find some evidence of a decline in educational enrolment, and an increase in unemployment and inactivity, although these results depend on the specification adopted.”
To further combat age discrimination, the government of New Zealand has issued guidelines for legislation to encourage thoughtful consideration of (not) including strict age limits that might negatively impact children. See “Does your policy need an age limit?”
The New Zealand Human Rights Commission oversees age discrimination matters. Official grounds for complaints may be found here, and complaints may be filed online here.
South Africa provides children with constitutional and statutory protection against age discrimination. Section 9 of the Constitution states that "the state may not unfairly discriminate directly or indirectly against anyone" on the grounds of age, and the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000 provides for the enactment of national legislation to prevent and prohibit unfair discrimination and to promote the achievement of equality. In addition, Section 6 of the Children's Act introduces the principle that children must be treated fairly and equitably and protected from unfair discrimination.
Relevant portions of the law may be accessed here.
Complaints of age discrimination may be addressed in writing to the South African Human Rights Commission here; detailed guidelines for the complaints process (including submission requirements) may be found in the Complaints Handling Manual on the same page. For more information, contact the child rights co-ordinator at: firstname.lastname@example.org
Sweden has recently prohibited age discrimination against children with the enactment of the Discrimination Act of 5 June, 2008. However, although age is listed as a protected factor and children are not excluded from protection against discrimination, differential treatment on grounds of age is in large part permitted "if there is a legitimate purpose and the means that are used are appropriate and necessary to achieve that purpose." The full text of the act is available here.
United Kingdom (Northern Ireland)
In Northern Ireland, public authorities have a statutory duty to "promote equality of opportunity between persons of different age” under Section 75 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998, available here.
Initiatives are underway elsewhere to get children included in equality legislation.
"The Ombudsman for Children in Norway's Supplementary Report to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child" pp. 10-11
Protection of children from age discrimination
Age is not specifically mentioned in Article 2 [of the Convention on the Rights of the Child]. However, it is recognised as a basis for discrimination in other conventions, and there are reasons to believe that age will be covered by "other status" in CRC Article 2. Age issues in Norway have, to a large extent, been focused on discrimination based on advanced age. Discrimination can however just as easily occur based on young age. Protection against age discrimination outside the workplace is not laid down in national legislation. The Ombudsman for Children would liek to put more focus on age as a basis for discrimination against children too.
The Ombudsperson for Equality and Anti-discrimination only handles cases on age discrimination within the workplace. Hence there is no appeals body to which children may apply in order to test age discrimination beyond the court system. The Ombudsperson for Children knows of no case in which age discrimintion against children has been tested in the Norwegian court system.
The Ombudsman requests that the Committee make the following recommendation to the State Party:
- The State party should assess how protection against age discrimination can be implemented within national legislation and ensure that children have the opportunity to file complaints.
A coalition of children's rights NGOs in the UK, Young Equals, is calling on the Government to:
- Remove the exclusion of under-18s from protection from unlawful age discrimination by people who supply services (including goods and facilities) or perform public functions
- Remove the exclusion of schools and children’s homes from the age element of the public sector equality duty
- Introduce a positive duty on public service providers to make reasonable adjustments for babies and young children travelling with parents and carers
Read more here.
Previous Publication (general) items
- 03/09/2009: COUNCIL OF EUROPE: Flawed enforcement of court decisions undermines the trust in State justice
- 03/09/2009: DISCRIMINACIÓN: La discriminación contra los niños en los medios de comunicación
- 02/09/2009: DISCRIMINATION: Challenging discrimination in the media
- 02/09/2009: DISCRIMINATION: Challenging discrimination in the media (Arabic)
- 02/09/2009: DISCRIMINATION: Briefing on multiple discrimination
Organisation Contact Details:
Child Rights International Network
2 Pontypool Place
Tel: +44 (0)207 401 2257
Last updated 01/10/2009 05:15:52